Stamford Civic Society
  • Home
  • Who we are
    • About the Society
    • Join us
    • Renew subscription
  • What we do
    • Projects >
      • The Sundial Project
      • School Projects
    • Stamford Urban Group
    • Newsletters
    • Other publications >
      • Annual review >
        • Annual Review 2018 >
          • Highlights of 2018
          • Mallory Lane
          • Eventful times
          • Off the wall
          • Town centre issues
          • In my time
          • Recognising the best
          • First impressions
          • National civic issues
          • Bland or inspiring
          • Arrivals and departures
          • Finances 2017-18
        • Annual Review 2017 >
          • Highlights of 2017
          • Open for tours
          • Eventful times
          • Keeping a watching brief
          • Town centre issues
          • Stamford: a celebration
          • Worth their weight in bronze
          • Getting the best advice
          • The Albert Bridge
          • From the Mercury
          • National civic issues
          • To bypass or not to bypass
          • Arrivals and a departure
          • Finances
        • Annual Review 2016 >
          • Highlights of the Year
          • Magical Metropolis
          • Eventful times
          • Keeping a Watching Brief
          • Tackling Town Centre Issues
          • My Favourite Building
          • An Arts & Crafts Treasure
          • Big, Bigger, Better?
          • What Do Young People Think?
          • Apethorpe Palace
          • National Civic Issues
          • Recognising the Best
          • Arrivals and Departures
        • Annual Review 2015
        • Annual Review 2014
      • Stones of Stamford Revisited
      • Articles
      • Archives
    • Awards >
      • 2018 Awards
      • 2014 Awards
      • 2011 Awards
      • 2009 Awards
  • Events
    • Coming events
    • Past events >
      • 50th anniversary 2017
  • Stamford Heritage
    • Introduction to Stamford
    • Stamford map
    • Plaques in Stamford >
      • Nelson Dawson
      • Sir Malcolm Sargent
      • William Stukeley
      • Blue plaques policy
    • Information boards
    • First Conservation Area
    • St Leonard's Priory
    • Browne's Hospital >
      • Visit Browne's
      • Common room
      • Chapel
      • Staircase
      • Audit room
      • Confrator's room
      • 50 years ago
      • Brownes in pictures
    • Other sites >
      • The Bastion
      • The Conduit
      • Daniel Lambert
      • The Institution
      • The Priest's House
      • Railway Station
      • Recreation Ground
      • Stamford School Chapel
      • Stamford Houses
      • Truesdale
    • Pictures >
      • 1960s pictures
      • 1900s pictures
      • 1870s pictures
      • Georgian Transport
  • Sponsors & partners
  • Contact us

Big, Bigger, Better?

Picture
Aerial photography by Matt Musgrave: matt_muz@hotmail.com
As Stamford’s new Neighbourhood Plan is being developed Peter Stean ponders one of the thorny issues which the Plan will need to address: how to balance development of the town whilst retaining its important heritage assets.
 
No doubt there are pleasant and unpleasant big towns and pleasant and unpleasant small towns. But does the character of a place change with its size? Many people would say that a city of 400,000 souls cannot have the same homogeneity as a town of 20,000. The larger place unavoidably will have a diversity that the smaller won’t; it may contain several shopping areas instead of one, and perhaps it has a number of different areas that draw people looking for entertainment or a choice of eating places.
 
On the other hand, if one adds 200 extra people to a town of 20,000 the benefits or otherwise may depend on the individual qualities the 200 bring with them, but the overall effect is most unlikely to change the character of the town. Add 20,000 to the town of 20,000 and there would seem to be almost universal consensus that the character will be changed. The difficult question, of course, might be, “At what point in terms of extra numbers does the change occur?” And how does one balance this with the need to house a growing population?
 
Do some towns have particular virtues that make it desirable to protect them from the effects of expansion? Well, it depends who you ask. Consult the senior members of the Local Authority and, if you can catch them at the right moment, you may not be surprised to hear that they like the larger tax base and greater revenues that come with expansion. A few thousand more homes and an industrial estate or two are really rather attractive. And the industrial estate will sound attractive to the unemployed, too. But what might the majority of those living in the town say?
 
Now we come to the crux of the matter. There are perhaps 40 or 50 attractive small towns in the country, and if you ​polled the inhabitants of each of them, I’ll bet that a significant majority in every one of them would take the view that their town is special to the point of deserving protection from the effects of development. “Well, maybe a little bit of infill here and there is okay and, indeed, may even be beneficial if it removes an eyesore! But we don’t want 2,000 new houses on the periphery of the town.” And if you are a Planner, you, of course, know in advance how the people will respond if asked, and if you don’t want to hear what they have to say you call it ‘nimby-ism’. (There are, of course, true died-in-the-wool nimbys, those who see the particular view from their windows as never to be violated by change, but there are also those who ascribe a value to a place well beyond their immediate prospect who don’t deserve to be tagged with the label.)
 
So if you want to save your town from large scale expansion and asking the people will result in an answer that can be discounted as ‘nimby-ism’, who should you ask? Maybe you could call on the ‘great and the good’ who don’t live in the town but might be thought able to bring discerning judgement to bear. In the case of Stamford, we could start with Pevsner and John Betjeman, but perhaps should leave out Celia Fiennes on the grounds that the town has changed more than somewhat since she last visited over 300 years ago. We do know that Henry Thorold, that esteemed and authoritative writer and enthusiast for the ‘best of Lincolnshire’, thought the town of “the right size” as he said just that. But what I think we now need is to identify a few heads of Heritage bodies and a handful or two of prestigious architects, and similar, who are prepared to say it. And I suspect we will need them quite soon in view of the noises being heard about Stamford’s potential for major expansion. So if you know such worthies, do let us know.
Previous page: An Arts & Crafts Treasure of National Importance
Next page: What Do Young People Think?
About the Society
Join us
Coming events
​Projects
Stamford Urban Group
Publications
​​Newsletters
Annual Review
Archives
Stamford heritage
Plaques in Stamford
William Stukeley
Browne's Hospital
The Priest's House
Stamford Mercury Archive

Contact us
Acknowledgements
Privacy policy

This website is archived in the
Internet Archive WayBackMachine
Copyright © 1962-2022 Stamford Civic Society
Registered charity no. 242571
Picture

a member of 
Civic Voice

Find us elsewhere:
Picture
Picture
Twitter
Picture
Facebook