Stamford Civic Society
  • Home
  • Who we are
    • About the Society
    • Join us
    • Renew subscription
  • What we do
    • Projects >
      • The Sundial Project
      • School Projects
    • Stamford Urban Group
    • Information boards
    • Newsletters
    • Other publications >
      • Annual review >
        • Annual Review 2018 >
          • Highlights of 2018
          • Mallory Lane
          • Eventful times
          • Off the wall
          • Town centre issues
          • Nelson Dawson
          • In my time
          • Recognising the best
          • First impressions
          • National civic issues
          • Bland or inspiring
          • Arrivals and departures
          • Finances 2017-18
        • Annual Review 2017 >
          • Highlights of 2017
          • Open for tours
          • Eventful times
          • Keeping a watching brief
          • Town centre issues
          • Stamford: a celebration
          • Worth their weight in bronze
          • Getting the best advice
          • The Albert Bridge
          • From the Mercury
          • National civic issues
          • To bypass or not to bypass
          • Arrivals and a departure
          • Finances
        • Annual Review 2016 >
          • Highlights of the Year
          • Magical Metropolis
          • Eventful times
          • Keeping a Watching Brief
          • Tackling Town Centre Issues
          • My Favourite Building
          • An Arts & Crafts Treasure
          • Big, Bigger, Better?
          • What Do Young People Think?
          • Apethorpe Palace
          • National Civic Issues
          • Recognising the Best
          • Arrivals and Departures
        • Annual Review 2015
        • Annual Review 2014
      • Stones of Stamford Revisited
      • Articles
      • Archives
    • Awards >
      • 2018 Awards
      • 2014 Awards
      • 2011 Awards
      • 2009 Awards
  • Events
    • Coming events
    • Past events >
      • Stamford in Bloom 2018
      • 50th anniversary 2017 >
        • Press release
        • Competition winner
  • Stamford Heritage
    • Introduction to Stamford
    • First Conservation Area
    • St Leonard's Priory
    • Browne's Hospital >
      • Visit Browne's
      • Common room
      • Chapel
      • Staircase
      • Audit room
      • Confrator's room
      • 50 years ago
      • Brownes in pictures
    • The Priest's House
    • Other buildings >
      • Truesdale
      • Stamford School Chapel
      • The Institution
      • Stamford Houses
      • Railway Station
    • Other sites >
      • The Bastion
      • The Conduit
      • Recreation Ground
      • Daniel Lambert
    • Points of interest >
      • Plaques in Stamford
      • William Stukeley
    • Georgian Transport
    • 1960s pictures
    • 1900s pictures
    • 1870s pictures
  • Sponsors & partners
  • Contact us

Getting the best advice

Commenting on planning applications is an important part of the Society’s role. It helps to ensure that we bring to the attention of SKDC planning authorities proposals that could damage the building in question and have a negative impact on the Conservation Area. We are fortunate to be able to call on five local experts for advice, whose professional expertise covers architecture, design and architectural history.

These professionals give a rigour to the Society’s comments on planning applications, and help to avoid a subjective response. They meet together once a month, hosted by Ross Thain, and go through current applications. Anyone professionally involved in a particular planning application does not contribute or influence the opinion of the other advisors.
Advisory committee
l to r: Ross Thain, David Heeley, Jon Richards, John Smith and James Heesom
What do they look for when considering a planning application? Well, it helps if the plans and paperwork are clear about the works intended – this is not always the case. Much time can be wasted when the applicant has not included sufficient detail. The advisors will recommend that SKDC asks for further information before a decision is made.

When changes will alter an historic building the advisors look to see that these are able to be reversed, and it will be possible to interpret the history and former iterations of the building. The advisors want to be constructive – just commenting adversely does not enable the homeowner or developer to understand how to solve an architectural problem. They can help prospective developers by offering informal but expert advice and where necessary will visit the property in question and discuss proposals.

A good example of how this works in practice was the development of Cobblestone Yard on Bath Row. The developers and their architect were happy to talk through their ideas and get our advisors’ opinions at an early stage of the planning process. One aspect of the design – how to replace the original distinctive fenestration – prompted much debate. As a result the existing hierarchy of the openings was retained and plans adapted to maximise light, without widening the openings as previously considered.

The advisors’ role, however, is solely advisory and the final response on planning applications is agreed by the Society’s Committee.
About the Society
Join us
Coming events
​Projects
Stamford Urban Group
Publications
​​Newsletters
Annual Review
Archives
Stamford heritage
Plaques in Stamford
William Stukeley
Browne's Hospital
The Priest's House
Stamford Mercury Archive

Contact us
Acknowledgements
Privacy policy

This website is archived in the
Internet Archive WayBackMachine
Copyright © 1962-2021 Stamford Civic Society
Registered charity no. 242571
Picture

a member of 
Civic Voice

Find us elsewhere:
Picture
Picture
Twitter
Picture
Facebook